
But, see, that's the problem with The Look of Love. It's too dramatic to be a comedy, too airy to be a drama, too cut-up to be a solid story. There's no way to cut Debbie out of the film, and she needs to be there to make Paul Raymond at all a sympathetic figure. Paul and Debbie are an unconventional, unhealthy example of a father/daughter relationship. Paul does little to intervene in Debbie's destructive decision making, and the two frequently party together. In fact, he draws her wholly into his world. In his nudie stage-shows, she's the clothed "star": innocent, weirdly wholesome, but entombed in a backstage life of coke, promiscuity, and (let's face it) screwed up perceptions of how relationships work between men and women. Winterbottom does his best to find meaning in Debbie and Paul's familial bond. They're close friends, proud to share blood, and Debbie makes much of her father's prominent place in her life. So, what we get is a film that turns into this weird daddy/daughter biopic about an enterprising asshole's guilt-trip in the wake of his daughter's demise. And you're thinking: sounds legit, what's wrong with it? Uh...we frequently lose track of Debbie, we always feel like we're watching Steve Coogan instead of Paul Raymond, and nobody involved knows whether this is a comedy or a drama.
What The Look of Love winds up doing then is simply showing a lot of skin. Coogan is given some unexpectedly poignant moments (which he's alright in), but mostly he's playing another in a line of the self-aware jerks he does best. Counter to him is the often much too sincere Imogen Poots, who looks every bit the 70s queen but whose relative soulfulness runs directly counter to Coogan's wink wink nudge nudge moments spent in threesomes, soft core shoots, and publicity stunts. There's no balance, and as we stumble rapidly through the three decades of material Winterbottom has chosen to cram in here, that imbalance makes for a confusing filmwatching experience. Is this a jaunty amorality tale? A cautionary indictment? A shredded take on Boogie Nights? A biopic at all? The loose form that worked with 24 Hour Party People, et al is lost here. There's nary a trace of metafictionality or snarky attention to the camera. Raymond isn't leading us, Coogan isn't playing a version of himself, the story isn't based on pre-postmodern absurdism. So, the thing falls apart under its own weight. Great costumes, great sets, great music, but...where does it lead?
No comments:
Post a Comment